Ronald C. Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[w]e do not hold that a one-time episode is not per se incapable of sustaining a hostile environment claim\
• noting that Meyer and Pierce would probably be decided today on First Amendment grounds
• finding conduct insufficiently severe, threatening, or humiliating where the “remarks were not directed specifically at plaintiffs” and were intended to educate
• applying Title VII easelaw by analogy to a hostile learning environment claim brought under Title IX
• distinguishing the free exercise claims arising from the plaintiffs' children's one-time compulsory attendance at a ninety-minute AIDS awareness program from those asserted in Yoder
• applying Parratt-Hudson doctrine where school failed to obtain parental permission for students’ viewing of sexually explicit presentation, in violation of school’s own sex education policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).