Eleventh Circuit· 5/3/2022

Omnipol, A.S. v. Christopher Worrell

Citations

32 F.4th 1298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining “claims of fraud must be pled with particularity, which means proffering the who, what, when, where, and how of the fraud alleged”
explaining “claims of fraud must be pled with particularity, which means proffering the who, what, when, where, and how of the fraud alleged”
subjecting an unjust enrichment claim premised on a fraudulent promise to Rule 9(b)
“Because [Plaintiffs’] claims of civil theft and unjust enrichment ‘sound in fraud,’ they are subject to Rule 9(b)’s requirements.”
“Because [the plaintiffs’] claims of civil theft and unjust enrichment ‘sound in fraud,’ they are subject to Rule 9(b)’s requirements.” (quoting Wilding, 941 F.3d at 1127)
in Westfall certification context, request for discovery cannot be based on allegations of complaint alone, and the plaintiff must forecast specific evidence that contradicts the Attorney General’s certification decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.