Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court· 6/14/1995

Gutierrez De Martinez v. Lamagno

Citations

  • 515 U.S. 417
  • 115 S. Ct. 2227
  • 132 L. Ed. 2d 375
  • 1995 U.S. LEXIS 4043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “26 U.S.C. § 6065 . . . requires that returns be signed under penalty of perjury”
  • holding that certification for purposes of substitution is judicially reviewable
  • holding that scope-of-employment certification is subject to judicial review
  • recognizing that the use of the word “‘shall’ generally means ‘must’”
  • stating that cases against the United States under the FTCA “unfold much as cases do against other employers who concede respondeat superior liability”
  • stating that cases against the United States under the FTCA “unfold much as cases do against other employers who concede respondeat superi- or liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Breyer, Souter, Rehnquist, Scaua, Thomas, Scalia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

336 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gutierrez De Martinez v. Lamagno

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.