Tenth Circuit· 9/6/2013
Niemi v. Lasshofer
Citations
- 728 F.3d 1252
- 2013 WL 4767016
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 18589
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the limitations on the Court’s inherent authority set forth in Grupo Mexicano are inapplicable to injunctions issued pursuant to the Colorado Organized Crime Control Act
- noting that where there are multiple threshold issues that can be resolved without engaging in the merits a court has “‘leeway to choose among’ them and to ‘take[] the less burdensome course’” (alteration in original
- noting that where there are multiple threshold issues that can be resolved without engaging in the merits a court has “‘leeway to choose among’ them and to ‘take[] the less burdensome course’” (alteration in original
- analyzing Fed. R. App. P. 28(j), which is nearly identical to Rule 8014(f)
- noting our affirmative obligation to question our jurisdiction and district court’s jurisdiction
- “In our adversarial system we don’t usually go looking for trouble but rely instead on the parties to identify the issues we must decide.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tymkovich, Gorsuch, Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kathleen Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2020-06-17· cited 383×
- Johnson v. SpencerTenth Circuit· 2020-02-13· cited 252×
- Niemi v. LasshoferTenth Circuit· 2014-11-04· cited 159×
- Bishop v. SmithTenth Circuit· 2014-07-18· cited 114×
- Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of EducatioNinth Circuit· 2023-09-13· cited 71×
- Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 2020-04-07· cited 39×
- Utah Physic. for Healthy Env't v. Diesel Power GearTenth Circuit· 2021-12-28· cited 25×
- Kellogg v. Watts GuerraTenth Circuit· 2022-07-26· cited 22×
- Feinberg v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueTenth Circuit· 2019-02-26· cited 18×
- Zapata-Chacon v. GarlandTenth Circuit· 2022-10-25· cited 10×
- Unitednet v. Tata Communications AmericaTenth Circuit· 2024-08-19· cited 3×
- United States v. RoarkTenth Circuit· 2025-06-23· cited 2×
- Kathleen Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2020-08-20
- Philip Montoya, Chapter 7 Trustee v. William FergusonTenth Circuit· 2024-01-23
- Keerikkattil v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-04-25
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 6,373×
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 1,961×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 1,894×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-10-08· cited 1,766×
- Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2011-03-14· cited 734×
- Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 621×
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court· 1897-05-24· cited 485×
- Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 445×
- Bixler v. FosterTenth Circuit· 2010-02-22· cited 407×
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-03-08· cited 401×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1876-11-27· cited 268×
- Crosby v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-01-13· cited 239×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1992-03-30· cited 222×
- Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. SebeliusTenth Circuit· 2013-06-27· cited 211×
- Hill v. KempTenth Circuit· 2007-03-06· cited 203×
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.Supreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 172×
- Allen v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1897-03-15· cited 153×
- Bohanan v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1887-10-17· cited 109×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.