Supreme Court· 11/27/1876
Smith v. United States
Citations
- 94 U.S. 97
- 24 L. Ed. 32
- 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1836
- 4 Otto 97
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that the Supreme Court has the discretion to refuse to hear a criminal case if the defendant has escaped from custody
- announcing that court considered it within its “dis- cretion to refuse to hear a criminal case in error, unless the convicted party, suing out the writ, is where he can be made to respond to any judgment we may render”
- dismissing fugitive's criminal appeal because he was not \where he [could] be made to respond to any judgment we may render\
- affirming dismissal of FOIA request related to criminal sentence appellant was evading by remaining in Panama
- giving a fugitive until the start of the next term to surrender or face dismissal
- removing case from docket upon discovery that petitioner had escaped from custody
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
200 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Beard v. KindlerSupreme Court· 2009-12-08· cited 599×
- Richard Joseph Lynn v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2004-04-14· cited 540×
- Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1970-01-20· cited 536×
- Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 445×
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-03-08· cited 401×
- Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court· 1975-04-14· cited 312×
- United States v. Campos-SerranoSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 217×
- Allen v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1897-03-15· cited 153×
- Sally Conforte v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph Conforte v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 1982-11-05· cited 138×
- Goeke v. BranchSupreme Court· 1995-03-20· cited 130×
- In Re Feit & Drexler, Inc.Second Circuit· 1985-04-12· cited 122×
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court· 2015-07-16· cited 118×
- Eisler v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 117×
- Bohanan v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1887-10-17· cited 109×
- Commonwealth v. PassaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-05-25· cited 94×
- United States v. Van CauwenbergheNinth Circuit· 1991-05-20· cited 94×
- National Union of Marine Cooks & Stewards v. ArnoldSupreme Court· 1954-11-22· cited 89×
- Collazos v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2004-05-18· cited 77×
- In Re Ben Jean Prevot and Arielle Dominique Prevot, the Minor Children. Jean-Claude Prevot v. Debra Moseman PrevotSixth Circuit· 1995-09-07· cited 70×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.