Skip to main content
· 1/10/1990

Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.

Citations

  • 493 U.S. 331
  • 110 S. Ct. 661
  • 107 L. Ed. 2d 696
  • 1990 U.S. LEXIS 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting shareholder standing is related to prudential concerns, not Article III
  • generally, under federal law, a plaintiff may assert only his or her own legal rights and not those of another
  • a plaintiff “cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third parties”
  • parent must demonstrate some injury to itself, independent of the injury to its subsidiary
  • federal court might be open if California courts actually refuse to hear constitutional claims
  • threat of relatively small financial injury sufficient to confer Article III standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.