· 1/10/1990
Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.
Citations
- 493 U.S. 331
- 110 S. Ct. 661
- 107 L. Ed. 2d 696
- 1990 U.S. LEXIS 337
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting shareholder standing is related to prudential concerns, not Article III
- generally, under federal law, a plaintiff may assert only his or her own legal rights and not those of another
- a plaintiff “cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third parties”
- parent must demonstrate some injury to itself, independent of the injury to its subsidiary
- federal court might be open if California courts actually refuse to hear constitutional claims
- threat of relatively small financial injury sufficient to confer Article III standing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.