· 3/30/1992
Federal Case
Citations
- 960 F.2d 1080
- 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1187
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5664
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a plaintiff had waived an argument by which it attempted to salvage personal jurisdiction on appeal because it had not raised the point in the lower court
- holding that a defendant need not have a physical presence in the forum and stating that the test \focuses instead upon whether the defendant attempted to participate in the commonwealth's economic life\
- stating that the same factors are relevant to the two inquiries in a federal question context
- requiring proof of lack of corporate independence, fraudulent intent and manifest injustice before the corporate unit will be ignored
- discussing personal jurisdiction in the context of dispute involving workers’ claims to benefits pursuant to Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
- noting the “conspicuous lack of support in the case law for transplanting this theory from the liability context to the jurisdictional context”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.