Skip to main content
E.D. Virginia· 7/3/1991

Nicol v. Imagematrix, Inc.

Citations

  • 767 F. Supp. 744
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9454
  • 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,068
  • 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 911
  • 1991 WL 125142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that charge of discrimination based on sex and pregnancy do not reasonably relate to allegations of sexual harassment or hostile environment claims
  • inquiring whether the state and federal claims are “separately maintainable and determinable without any reference to the facts alleged ... with regard to the other count.”
  • administrative charge alleged “only pregnancy discrimination”; judicial count alleging “sex discrimination based on pregnancy” was allowed
  • federal sex discrimination claims and state-law contract claims found to be distinct although both were directed at same employer
  • likelihood state law claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress would fail because dismissal of pregnant employee does not satisfy second prong of Womack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Nicol v. Imagematrix, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.