Skip to main content
E.D. Virginia· 12/11/2003

Lovell v. BBNT Solutions, LLC

Citations

  • 295 F. Supp. 2d 611
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22360
  • 2003 WL 22940922

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Neither the statute nor controlling circuit authority squarely addresses whether full-time employees are, on that basis alone, unsuitable comparators for part-time employee plaintiffs.”
  • “Although the statutory language does not conclusively answer this question, Congress’s use of the word ‘rate’ points persuasively to the conclusion that a valid comparison is not necessarily foreclosed merely on the basis of a difference in the number of hours worked per week.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.