Skip to main content
· 8/1/1994

Loretta Cheek v. Western and Southern Life Insurance Company

Citations

  • 31 F.3d 497
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19775
  • 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 727
  • 1994 WL 398219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an EEOC charge and complaint must, at minimum, describe the same conduct and implicate the same individuals
  • holding that sexual harassment claim cannot be reasonably inferred from sexual discrimination claim in plaintiffs EEOC charge
  • recognizing that “an employer may discriminate on the basis of sex in numerous ways”
  • holding that harassment claim was not reasonably related to discrimination claim in EEOC charge
  • determining that in assessing scope of EEOC Charge, court may consider statements in sworn affidavit
  • finding that plaintiff had not provided ample notice to her employer that she was complaining of a hostile work environment because that claim could not even be inferred from her complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Coffey, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.