Skip to main content
· 6/5/2025

Martin Misjuns v. City of Lynchburg

Citations

  • 139 F.4th 378

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the importance of permanency cannot be equated with any particular idea of what that permanency should look like” and concluding that termination of parental rights to an unfit parent was not in the child’s best interests
  • noting that “the importance of permanency cannot be equated with any particular idea of what that permanency should look like” and concluding that termination of parental rights to an unfit parent was not in the child’s best interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.