Riley v. TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the retaliation exception “does not apply . . . when the alleged retaliation could have been raised in the original EEOC complaint”
• concluding, in the context of a wrongful discharge claim, that “dissatisfaction with work assignments and feelings of being unfairly criticized are simply insufficient” to show that working conditions were intolerable
• finding that where an act of retaliation occurred prior to the filing of the EEOC charge and the plaintiffs failed to check the “retaliation” box, the retaliation claims were not administratively exhausted
• \Plaintiffs must exhaust their administrative remedies when the alleged retaliation could have been raised in the original EEOC complaint.\
• “Plaintiffs must exhaust their administrative remedies when the alleged retaliation could have been raised in the original [administrative] complaint.”
• stating elements' of “discharge on the basis of gender”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).