D.C. Circuit· 2/22/2013
Nick Koretoff v. Tom Vilsack
Citations
- 404 U.S. App. D.C. 96
- 707 F.3d 394
- 2013 WL 645929
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3695
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that even final rules need not comprehensively explain relevant legal theories
- rejecting argument that “the Secretary was ‘obligated under the APA to address [his] statutory authority sua sponte,’ whether ‘raised by a commenter or not’ ”
- arguments not raised before agency may be raised in timely challenge to application of rule
- forfeiture does not preclude ability to challenge rule “if and when the Secretary applies” it
- “A party will normally forfeit an opportunity to challenge an agency rulemaking on a ground that was not first presented to the agency for its initial consideration.” (quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tatel, Brown, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Center for Sustainable Economy v. Sally JewellD.C. Circuit· 2015-03-06· cited 56×
- Hispanic Affairs Project v. R. Alexander AcostaD.C. Circuit· 2018-08-17· cited 34×
- American Bankers Association v. National Credit Union AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2019-08-20· cited 31×
- State of California v. Alex Azar, IINinth Circuit· 2020-02-24· cited 20×
- American Forest Resource Council v. AsheDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-30· cited 17×
- Banner Health v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-02· cited 16×
- Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon v. JewellDistrict of Columbia· 2014-12-12· cited 12×
- Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2015-06-16· cited 11×
- Pacific Ranger, LLC v. PritzkerDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-30· cited 10×
- Otsuka Pharm. Co. v. BurwellD.C. Circuit· 2016-07-28· cited 9×
- Tindal v. McHughDistrict of Columbia· 2013-05-23· cited 8×
- Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2018-06-11· cited 8×
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Fed. Election Comm'nD.C. Circuit· 2018-08-03· cited 8×
- Huntco Pawn Holdings, LLC v. U.S. Department of DefenseDistrict of Columbia· 2016-10-03· cited 6×
- Fritch v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict of Columbia· 2016-10-27· cited 5×
- Hispanic Affairs Project v. AcostaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-07-07· cited 5×
- California by and through Becerra v. AzarNinth Circuit· 2019-06-20· cited 5×
- Healthalliance Hospitals, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-16· cited 4×
- E. Tex. Med. Center-Athens v. AzarD.C. Circuit· 2018-10-18· cited 4×
- Property Casualty Insurers Ass'n of America v. DonovanN.D. Illinois· 2014-09-03· cited 3×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1943-02-01· cited 3,975×
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 1,832×
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyD.C. Circuit· 1996-07-03· cited 777×
- Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2004-09-01· cited 189×
- Functional Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Functional Music, Inc. v. United States of America, Federal Communications CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1959-10-12· cited 148×
- Creighton Ltd. v. Government of QatarD.C. Circuit· 1999-07-02· cited 144×
- National Labor Relations Board Union v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityD.C. Circuit· 1987-12-04· cited 115×
- Advocates for Highway & Auto Safety v. Federal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2005-12-02· cited 111×
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Edison Electric Institute, IntervenorsD.C. Circuit· 1994-06-27· cited 100×
- Lomas Mortgage, Inc. v. Esperandieu & Antonine LouisFirst Circuit· 1996-04-18· cited 89×
- Laurence Gage v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America Commonwealth Edison Company, IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1973-05-23· cited 85×
- Murphy Exploration & Production Co. v. United States Department of the InteriorD.C. Circuit· 2001-06-19· cited 65×
- American Forest and Paper Association v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyFifth Circuit· 1998-03-30· cited 60×
- State of Ohio v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1993-07-20· cited 58×
- Orion Reserves Ltd. Partnership v. SalazarD.C. Circuit· 2009-01-23· cited 53×
- City of Seabrook, Texas v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyFifth Circuit· 1981-10-30· cited 49×
- BCCA Appeal Group v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyFifth Circuit· 2003-10-28· cited 34×
- Independent Community Bankers of America v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve SystemD.C. Circuit· 1999-11-02· cited 29×
- Murphy Exploration & Production Co. v. United States Department of InteriorD.C. Circuit· 2001-11-09· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.