American Forest and Paper Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that purely legal issue was ripe for review because injuries were not speculative and deferring review would impose an immediate, significant burden on the petitioner
• holding that purely legal issue was ripe for review because injuries were not speculative and deferring review would impose an immediate, significant burden on the petitioner
• holding that purely legal issue was ripe for review because injuries were not speculative and deferring review would impose an immediate, significant burden on the petitioner
• “During the public comment period, EPA was presented with detailed objections concerning the scope of endangered species protection under Louisiana’s proposed program.”
• \EPA has failed to identify any provision in the CWA that suggests a party's failure to comment waives its right to seek judicial review.\
• where the EIS indicated that “the Forest Service did not even consider mitigating measures for the creeks actually affected by the” action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).