Lomas Mortgage, Inc. v. Esperandieu & Antonine Louis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, notwithstanding the time limit in the Clean Air Act’s review provision, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b
• finding that § 1322(b)(2) does not bar modification of a secured claim on a multi-unit property in which one unit is debtor’s principal residence and the security interest extends to other income-producing units
• finding that Lomas was good law; the debtor could modify a mortgage holders claim secured by a multi-unit building
• finding that the First Circuit’s holding in Lomas Mortg., Inc. v. Louis was not overruled by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005
• noting that \[i]t is unlikely Congress intended the antimodification provision to reach a 100-unit apartment complex simply because the debtor lives in one of the units.\
• finding that § 1322(b)(2) does not bar modification of a secured claim on a multi-unit property in which one unit is debtor’s principal residence and the security interest extends to other income-producing units

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).