Murphy Exploration & Production Co. v. United States Department of Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exhaustion 3 is not required “when a rule is ‘brought before this court for review of further [agency] action 4 applying it.’” (quoting Functional Music, Inc. v. FCC, 274 F.2d 543, 546 (D.C. Cir. 1958)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).