Orion Reserves Ltd. Partnership v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under the substantial evidence standard, courts “reverse an agency’s decision only when the record is so compelling that no reasonable factfin-der could fail to find to the contrary” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “‘A regulation which . . . operates to create a rule out of harmony with the statute is a mere nullity.’” (alteration in original) (quoting Manhattan Gen. Equip. Co. v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 297 U.S. 129, 134 (1936)
• “[A] regulation contrary to a statute is void.”
• “[A] regulation contrary to a statute is void.”
• “[A] regulation contrary to a statute is void.”
• “[A] regulation contrary to a statute is void.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).