Desmarteau v. City of Wichita, Kan.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding constructive discharge not a tangible employment action under Burlington
• “plaintiff s claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, which is subject to a two-year limitations period under K.S.A. 60-513[a][4], is also time-barred”
• the Supreme Court’s focus on the tangible actions of the supervisor logically excludes actions which are “constructively” attributed to h i m

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).