Bland v. New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the judge exercised “complete control” over the plaintiffs position as secretary because she “was wholly and solely responsible to [the judge] in the performance of her job duties”
• explaining that a personal secretary who controlled the flow of information to an elected official was placed in a “sensitive” 15 and “intimate” position of trust that rendered her a member of the personal staff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).