Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 11/7/1985

Newman v. State

Citations

499 A.2d 492
65 Md. App. 85
1985 Md. App. LEXIS 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that improper admission of a prior consistent statement was not harmless error when it bolstered a witness’s testimony
when the State's case depends virtually exclusively on the credibility of a witness, the bolstering of the witness's credibility by prior consistent statements cannot be harmless error
when the State’s case depends virtually exclusively on the credibility of a witness, the bolstering of the witness’s credibility by prior consistent statements cannot be harmless error
whether person was responsible for supervision is a question of fact for the factfinder
“to be admissible, the remainder must not only relate to the subject matter, but must also tend ‘to explain and shed light on the meaning of the part already received’ or ‘to correct a prejudicially misleading impression left by the introduction of misleading evidence.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.