United States v. Rappy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where witness declares that item or writing has evoked memory, it may be shown “either that it has not evoked what appears to the witness as a memory, or that, although it may so appear to him, the memory is a phantom and not a reliable record of its content”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).