Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/12/1976
Ross v. State
Citations
- 350 A.2d 680
- 276 Md. 664
- 1976 Md. LEXIS 1110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when “several offenses are so connected in point of time or circumstances that one cannot be fully shown without proving the other,” then evidence of other bad acts is admissible to show motive
- recognizing exception that permits the State to show a defendant's propensity for illicit sexual relations under certain circumstances
- recognizing exception that permits the State to show a defendant’s propensity for illicit sexual relations under certain circumstances
- similarly criticizing federal cases for automatically admitting similar bad-acts evidence on intent without any analysis
- similarly criticizing federal cases for automatically admitting similar bad-acts evidence on intent without any analysis
- \[T]he admission of other crimes evidence should be subjected to rigid scrutiny by the courts....\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, O'Donnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
148 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2003-09-03· cited 209×
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-08-11· cited 172×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-17· cited 171×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-01· cited 149×
- Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-28· cited 144×
- State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-07· cited 137×
- Hillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-05· cited 136×
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-25· cited 131×
- Trusty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-04· cited 124×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-14· cited 116×
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-06-28· cited 107×
- Cross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-05-04· cited 104×
- Rubin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-06· cited 102×
- McKnight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-06· cited 101×
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-08-05· cited 99×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-08· cited 89×
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-22· cited 89×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-05-06· cited 76×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-06-09· cited 75×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-07· cited 80×
- State v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-06-26· cited 63×
- MacEwen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-01· cited 56×
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-04-12· cited 37×
- Francis Ray Robinson v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1966-09-20· cited 36×
- Wethington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-02-23· cited 36×
- United States v. Jake Frank RichardsonEighth Circuit· 1973-04-20· cited 33×
- Gorski v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-04-21· cited 31×
- United States v. Armando Martinez ValenciaNinth Circuit· 1974-02-01· cited 28×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-13· cited 28×
- Gilchrist v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-12-18· cited 21×
- Chandler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-12-17· cited 14×
- United States v. Andrew A. WilliamsSecond Circuit· 1972-12-13· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.