Idaho Supreme Court· 10/10/2007

Nelson v. Nelson

Citations

170 P.3d 375
144 Idaho 710
2007 Ida. LEXIS 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the question on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion, “not whether this Court would have made the same decision.”
noting that appellate review is limited to the evidence and issues presented in the trial court
declining to address challenges to superseded orders on appeal because such challenges are “neither timely nor appropriate”
“We have long held that ‘[a]ppellate court review is limited to the evidence, theories and arguments that were presented below.’ ”
“[t]his Court will not attempt to substitute its judgment and discretion for that of the trial court, except in cases where the record reflects a clear abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trout, Eismann, Burdick, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Nelson v. Nelson

220 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.