Missouri Court of Appeals· 7/11/2006

Nelson v. Nelson

Citations

195 S.W.3d 502
2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075
2006 WL 1889291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a trial court is free to believe all, some, or none of any expert witness’s testimony on valuation
stating the trial court implicitly found parent was unemployed by “imputing” the entire amount of the parent’s income
appellant’s “point is nothing more than an abstract regurgitation of the Murphy v. Carron standard of review, which is unacceptable in satisfying the requirements of Rule 84.04(d)”
court is prohibited from finding a fair market value not supported by the evidence
evidence was sufficient to demonstrate that private education 11 would meet the particular educational needs of the parties’ children, and the record supported the trial court’s dissolution decision to include it as an extraordinary child rearing cost in the Form 14 calculation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Newton, Holliger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.