Skip to main content

Nelson v. Nelson

Citations

  • 205 P.3d 715
  • 288 Kan. 570
  • 2009 Kan. LEXIS 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding constructive fraud is not exclusive basis for imposition of constructive trust
  • when considering summaiy judgment motion, district judge must consider evidence in light most favorable to nonmoving party
  • nonclaim statute applies to third-party beneficiary’s breach of contract claims; does not shorten time for tort claims, including fraud, under K.S.A. 59-2239[2]
  • claim that decedent breached promise in property settlement to place entire estate in trust for benefit of adult children was claim against estate that needed to be brought within time limits of nonclaim statute
  • noting exception for torts, including fraud, in K.S.A. 59- 2239[2]
  • discussing elements of unjust enrichment in context of constructive trust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.