Michalk v. Michalk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “very few, if any” of the appellant’s arguments could be considered on appeal because the appellant, though present at trial, remained silent throughout the proceedings
• concluding that attorneys are expected to know the rules of the forum, and pro se litigants are not afforded a more lenient standard
• noting pro se litigants are not accorded special latitude and are held to the same standards and rules as litigants represented by counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).