Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/17/1921
Nelson v. Nelson
Citations
- 149 Minn. 285
- 183 N.W. 354
- 1921 Minn. LEXIS 650
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Minnesota follows the common-law “rule of separate property rights of both husband and wife” and has not adopted “[t]he doctrine of community property”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.