Skip to main content

Barrett v. Barrett

Citations

  • 232 P.3d 799
  • 149 Idaho 21
  • 2010 Ida. LEXIS 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing situations in divorce proceedings when a court may not consider parol evidence related to a real property conveyance
  • “[T]he inquiry is whether the character of [the relevant] property changed during the marriage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Jones, Eismann, Burdick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.