Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting the rule to \transactions involving the sale of goods for commercial purposes where economic expectations are protected by commercial and contract law\
• explaining that the economic loss doctrine provides that “[w]here a purchaser’s expectations in a sale are frustrated because the product he bought is not working properly, his remedy is said to be in contract alone, for he has suffered only ‘economic’ losses”
• explaining that the economic loss doctrine provides that “[w]here a purchaser’s expectations in a sale are frustrated because the product he bought is not working properly, his remedy is said to be in contract alone, for he has suffered only ‘economic’ losses”
• explaining that the economic loss doctrine provides that “where a purchaser’s expectations in a sale are frustrated because the product he bought is not working properly, his remedy is said to be in contract alone, for he has suffered only economic losses.”
• applying economic loss doctrine to disallow products liability claim where milking equipment injured cows
• “Contract principles ... are generally more appropriate for determining claims for consequential damage that the parties have, or could have, addressed in their agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

115 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 2004-12-23· cited 431×
• Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. Precision Consulting Services, Inc.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-03-20· cited 227×
• Sherman v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-08-08· cited 188×
• Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2010-02-05· cited 186×
• Patterson v. Kleiman
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1994-11-15· cited 172×
• Indemnity Ins. Co. v. American Aviation
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-12-23· cited 138×
• All-Tech Telecom, Inc. v. Amway Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1999-04-07· cited 127×
• Rinaldo's Construction Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1997-03-04· cited 109×
• Alejandre v. Bull
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-03-01· cited 102×
• Trinity Industries, Inc. v. McKinnon Bridge Co.
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-11-28· cited 95×
• 24 Ucc rep.serv.2d 843, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,914 Bailey Farms, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Nor-Am Chemical Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1994-01-12· cited 91×
• In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
  S.D. Ohio· 2012-07-19· cited 85×
• In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires Products
  S.D. Indiana· 2001-07-27· cited 80×
• Gunkel v. Renovations, Inc.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-02-01· cited 77×
• Bouverette v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2001-06-18· cited 73×
• In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2017-06-30· cited 72×
• Catalina Marketing Sales Corp. v. Department of Treasury
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2004-05-05· cited 71×
• Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2013-07-30· cited 67×
• Detroit Edison Co. v. NABCO, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1994-08-30· cited 53×
• Llewellyn-Jones v. Metro Property Group, LLC
  E.D. Michigan· 2014-05-27· cited 50×

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-16· cited 1,227×
• Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-02-19· cited 846×
• Seely v. White Motor Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1965-06-23· cited 667×
• Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1965-02-17· cited 357×
• Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-03-28· cited 246×
• Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1958-06-12· cited 170×
• Clark v. International Harvester Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1978-06-30· cited 159×
• Wilkinson v. Harrington
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1968-06-25· cited 154×
• Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-03-26· cited 134×
• Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Universal Oil Products
  Texas Supreme Court· 1978-07-12· cited 124×
• Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Manufacturing Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-25· cited 119×
• Hapka v. Paquin Farms
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-08-03· cited 105×
• Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-02· cited 100×
• Nebraska Innkeepers, Inc. v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1984-02-15· cited 92×
• Star Furniture Co. v. Pulaski Furniture Co.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-11-18· cited 79×
• Sullivan Industries, Inc. v. Double Seal Glass Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-12-27· cited 72×
• Waggoner v. Town & Country Mobile Homes, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1990-12-27· cited 63×
• Russell v. Ford Motor Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-03-21· cited 62×
• Parish v. B F Goodrich Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1975-11-25· cited 59×
• Kershaw County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-09-17· cited 51×