Skip to main content
· 2/5/2010

Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 594 F.3d 238
  • 72 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 137
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2497
  • 2010 WL 395915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the particular difficulty in making the contract/tort distinction in products liability actions
  • “Futility means that the complaint, as amended, would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • a district court may deny a motion to amend when the amended complaint “would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted” (citation omitted)
  • a district court may deny a motion to amend when the amended complaint “would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted” (citation omitted)
  • “Under New Jersey law, [courts] must interpret the parties’ contract according to its plain language, by “reading the document as a whole in a fair and common sense manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Hardiman, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.