Clark v. International Harvester Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “judicial expansion of negligence law to cover purely economic losses would only add more confusion in an area already plagued with overlapping and conflicting theories of recovery”
• providing, as an example, “ ‘where an automobile is wrecked by reason of its own bad brakes ... ’ ”
• denying the recovery of economic losses sustained by a plaintiff who claimed a tractor was negligently manufactured
• both limitations were “integral parts of the provision, reciprocal to one another, and together they represented the agreed allocation of risk between the parties”
• \The UCC is ambiguous with respect to the effect that a failure of a limited remedy under [§ 2-719(@2)] has on other contractual provisions.\
• \The UCC is ambiguous with respect to the effect that a failure of a limited remedy under [§ 2-719(2)] has on other contractual provisions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).