Skip to main content
· 8/8/2002

Sherman v. Sea Ray Boats, Inc

Citations

  • 649 N.W.2d 783
  • 251 Mich. App. 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that economic loss doctrine applied when the individual consumer plaintiff purchased defective boat from defendant manufacturer
  • concluding that economic loss doctrine applied when the individual consumer plaintiff purchased defective boat from defendant manufacturer
  • explaining that a party may not leave it to this Court to search for authority to support its claim
  • stating that, where a plaintiff seeks only economic loss and not damages for physical injury, “tort concerns with product safety no longer apply, and economic expectation issues prevail”
  • economic loss doctrine applied when the individual consumer plaintiff purchased a boat from the defendant manufacturer
  • “This Court’s review is limited to the record established by the trial court, and a party may not expand the record on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hood, Gage, Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.