Bouverette v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a verdict in the defendant’s favor on a negligence claim was not inconsistent with a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor on a claim of breach of implied warranty
• “[T]he adequacy of a warning is an issue of reasonableness, and reasonableness is a question of fact.”
• “[A]n opposing party’s disagreement with an expert’s opinion or interpretation of facts . . . are matters of the weight to be accorded to the testimony, not its admissibility.”
• “When the standard jury instructions do not adequately cover an area, the trial court is obligated to give additional instructions when requested, if the supplemental instructions properly inform the jury of the applicable law and are supported by the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).