Texas Supreme Court· 1/14/1987
Musser v. Smith Protective Services, Inc.
Citations
- 723 S.W.2d 653
- 30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 142
- 1987 Tex. LEXIS 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- predicate fact question about meaning and effect of words may be passed to jury
- statement that former employee \relieved\ his former employer of some of its accounts is not defamatory because it does not accuse employee of anything other than competitiveness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spears, Robertson, Ray, Mauzy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
200 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 1,433×
- Turner v. KTRK Television, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2000-12-21· cited 446×
- Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court· 1997-07-09· cited 383×
- Dolcefino v. RandolphTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-06-08· cited 362×
- Cropper v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1988-05-25· cited 316×
- Joseph E. Hancock v. Easwaran P. VariyamTexas Supreme Court· 2013-05-17· cited 277×
- Alaniz v. HoytTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-05-08· cited 194×
- Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-04-03· cited 178×
- the Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Houston, Inc. v. John Moore Services, Inc. and John Moore Renovation, LLCTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-07-16· cited 176×
- New Times, Inc. v. IsaacksTexas Supreme Court· 2004-09-03· cited 173×
- Duran v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1996-05-01· cited 160×
- the Dallas Morning News, Inc. and Steve Blow v. John Tatum and Mary Ann TatumTexas Supreme Court· 2018-05-11· cited 155×
- George Farias v. Bexar County Board of Trustees for Mental Health Mental Retardation ServicesFifth Circuit· 1991-04-12· cited 152×
- Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton, S.A.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-22· cited 141×
- D Magazine Partners, L.P. v. RosenthalTexas Supreme Court· 2017-03-17· cited 132×
- Rehak Creative Services, Inc. and Robert Rehak v. Ann L. Witt, Ellen Witt, Raymond Witt and Ann Witt CampaignTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-05-21· cited 123×
- Knox v. TaylorTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-04-08· cited 120×
- Marshall Field Stores, Inc. v. GardinerTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-07-29· cited 101×
- Vice v. KasprzakTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-12-09· cited 93×
- Moore v. WaldropTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-05-25· cited 88×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fitzjarrald v. Panhandle Publishing Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1950-02-22· cited 66×
- Cotulla v. KerrTexas Supreme Court· 1889-05-21· cited 66×
- Beaumont Enterprise & Journal v. SmithTexas Supreme Court· 1985-03-06· cited 56×
- Gartman v. HedgpethTexas Supreme Court· 1941-12-10· cited 22×
- Taylor v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1971-01-01· cited 13×
- Musser v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-03-28· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.