· 5/17/2013
Joseph E. Hancock v. Easwaran P. Variyam
Citations
- 400 S.W.3d 59
- 56 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 561
- 2013 WL 2150468
- 2013 Tex. LEXIS 394
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that determination of whether statement is defamatory per se is question of law
- defining defamation “as the invasion of a person’s interest in her reputation and good name”
- describing defamation per se statements as those that injure a person in his “office, profession, or occupation”
- discussing rationale behind presuming harm in defamation per se cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Guzman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.