Dolcefino v. Randolph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating media defendants need not establish the substantial truth of reported allegations
• use of phrase “could not” when “would not” was actually correct was of secondary importance and statement was substantially true
• party should obtain ruling “at, before, or very near” the time the court decides the summary judgment motion
• whether media defendant “learned” of or “instigated” an investigation may be disregarded as of secondary importance
• requiring facts to support conclusions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).