Rehak Creative Services, Inc. and Robert Rehak v. Ann L. Witt, Ellen Witt, Raymond Witt and Ann Witt Campaign

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that linked documents were part of the context that had to be considered in addressing what a website conveyed about the plaintiff
• finding that “linked documents are part of the context that must be taken into consideration” and distinguishing providing links from cases where the speaker “referenced documents that supposedly supported allegations . . . but did not make those documents accessible”
• refusing to accept conclusory assertions as clear and specific evidence of a prima facie case
• analyzing whether plaintiff had provided prima facie evidence of its claims for tortious interference, intentional infliction of emotional distress, conspiracy, and conversion and then dismissing those claims in the absence of evidence
• “[I]ntangible property cannot be converted unless the underlying intangible [property] right has been merged into a document that has been converted.” (Citations omitted)
• movant’s burden on TCPA motion satisfied as to conversion, civil conspiracy, and misappropriation claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).