Moore v. Waldrop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding use of the word “crook” did not impute a specific crime, and was mere “name calling” and general disparagement; therefore it was not slander per se
• accusing someone of committing a crime constitutes slander per se
• accusing someone of committing a crime constitutes slander per se
• accusing someone of committing a crime constitutes slander per se

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).