· 4/8/1999
Knox v. Taylor
Citations
- 992 S.W.2d 40
- 1999 WL 270020
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting terminable-on-notice status of contract as defense to tortious-interference-with-contract claim and holding third party's mailing of defamatory memo interfered with plaintiff's business relationship
- rejecting terminable-on-notice status of contract as defense to tortious-interference-with-contract claim and holding third party’s mailing of defamatory memo interfered with plaintiffs business relationship
- evidence that statements were understood by recipient as being injurious to plaintiffs business supports finding of defamation per se
- “In the recovery on a claim of defamation per se, the law presumes actual damages and no independent proof of damages to reputation or of mental anguish is required.”
- evidence that statements were understood by recipient as being injurious to plaintiff's business supports finding of defamation per se
- evidence that statements were understood by recipient as being injurious to plaintiff’s business supports finding of defamation per se
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yates, Fowler, Draughn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.