Skip to main content
· 4/8/1999

Knox v. Taylor

Citations

  • 992 S.W.2d 40
  • 1999 WL 270020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting terminable-on-notice status of contract as defense to tortious-interference-with-contract claim and holding third party's mailing of defamatory memo interfered with plaintiff's business relationship
  • rejecting terminable-on-notice status of contract as defense to tortious-interference-with-contract claim and holding third party’s mailing of defamatory memo interfered with plaintiffs business relationship
  • evidence that statements were understood by recipient as being injurious to plaintiffs business supports finding of defamation per se
  • “In the recovery on a claim of defamation per se, the law presumes actual damages and no independent proof of damages to reputation or of mental anguish is required.”
  • evidence that statements were understood by recipient as being injurious to plaintiff's business supports finding of defamation per se
  • evidence that statements were understood by recipient as being injurious to plaintiff’s business supports finding of defamation per se

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yates, Fowler, Draughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.