Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 7/7/1998

Murray v. United States

Citations

  • 145 F.3d 1249
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 15048
  • 1998 WL 374952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate review is limited to the issue or issues presented in the certificate of appealability
  • holding that “in an appeal brought by an unsuccessful habeas petitioner, appellate review is limited to the issues specified in the COA”
  • holding that the scope of review in a § 2255 motion is limited to the issues specified in the certificate of appealability
  • holding that the scope of our review is limited to the issues specified in the COA
  • holding that “in an appeal brought by an unsuccessful habeas petitioner, appellate review is limited to the issues specified in the COA”
  • holding that the scope of appellate review in § 2255 proceedings is limited to the specific issues indicated in the COA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Carnes, Hull, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.