Todd Hiivala v. Tana Wood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “general appeals to broad constitutional principles, such as due process, equal protection, and the right to a fair trial, are insufficient to establish exhaustion” (emphasis added)
• holding that petitioner failed to exhaust federal due process issue in state 24 court because petitioner presented claim in state court only on state grounds
• holding that petitioner failed to exhaust federal due process issue in state court 25 because petitioner presented claim in state court only on state grounds
• holding that petitioner failed to exhaust federal due process issue in state 11 court because petitioner presented claim in state court only on state grounds
• holding that petitioner 8 failed to exhaust federal due process issue in state court because petitioner 9 presented claim in state court only on state grounds
• holding that petitioner failed to exhaust federal due 6 process issue in state court because petitioner presented claim in state court only on state 7 grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).