Keith Lamont Jordan v. Secretary, DOC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that after this Court grants a petitioner authorization to file a second or successive habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), the district court must “determine for itself whether [the statutory] requirements are met”
• explaining that this Court's determination that an applicant has made a primafacie showing that the statutory criteria have been met is simply a threshold determination
• explaining that this Court's determination that an applicant has made a prima facie showing that the statutory criteria have been met is simply a threshold determination
• explaining that this Court’s determination that an applicant has made a prima facie showing that the statutory criteria have been met is simply a threshold determination
• explaining that this Court’s determination that an applicant has made a prima facie showing that the statutory criteria have been met is simply a threshold determination
• explaining that this Court’s determination that an applicant has made a prima facie showing that the statutory criteria have been met is simply a threshold determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).