Skip to main content
· 9/11/2000

Alixcair Valverde v. James Stinson, Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Fac.

Citations

  • 224 F.3d 129
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prisoner is required \to demonstrate a 24 causal relationship between the extraordinary circumstances on which the claim for 25 equitable tolling rests and the lateness of his filing\
  • holding that, to warrant the application of equitable tolling, the petition must \demonstrate a causal relationship between the extraordinary circumstances on which the claim for equitable tolling rests and the lateness of the filing\
  • noting that the Court of Appeals should address only claims included in certificate of appealability
  • noting that a petitioner is not ineligible for equitable tolling for waiting until late in the limitations period to file a habeas petition
  • explaining that a petitioner must show that he “exercised reasonable diligence in attempting to file after the extraordinary circumstances began”
  • holding “if the petitioner, acting with reasonable diligence, could have filed on time notwithstanding the extraordinary circumstances,” then equitable tolling was not available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Leval, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.