Fifth Circuit· 1/5/2000

Munoz v. Orr

Citations

200 F.3d 291
53 Fed. R. Serv. 1131
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 63
77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,297
81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that an expertʹs reliance on data provided by a plaintiff, without conducting independent verification, gives rise to ʺcommon‐sense skepticismʺ regarding the expertʹs evaluation
declining to consider evidence that was struck and therefore \not before the district court\
in Title VII disparate impact claim, “the evidence will focus on the degree of statistical disparity between protected and non-protected workers in regards to employment or promotion”
“District courts have considerable discretion in managing discovery.”
discovery rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Barksdale, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Munoz v. Orr

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.