Fifth Circuit· 9/30/2003

Frank v. Xerox Corp.

Citations

347 F.3d 130
2003 WL 22233805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the continuing violations doctrine is equitable in nature and extends the limitations period on otherwise time barred claims only when the unlawful employment practice manifests itself over time, rather than as a series of discrete acts
finding direct evidence of unlawful discrimination where the employer explicitly identified racial goals and managers were evaluated on how well they complied with the affirmative action policy’s objectives
applying the same elements to “hostile work environment claims” brought under both Title VII and Section 1981
finding direct evidence of unlawful discrimination where the employer explicitly identified racial goals and managers were evaluated on how well they complied with the affirmative action policy’s objectives
finding claims including discriminatory denial of promotions and pay increases to be discrete acts to which continuing violation doctrine did not apply despite allegations from plaintiffs that “(1
existence of affirmative action policy, coupled with evidence that policy was followed in the adverse employment action, constituted direct evidence of unlawful discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clement, Feldman, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.