Quiet Technology DC-8, Inc., Quiet Technology, Inc. v. Hurel-Dubois UK LTD.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that failure to include variables will affect the probativeness of the analysis, not its admissibility
• holding that argument that expert failed to include all available flight test parameters in his model go to the weight, not the admissibility, of the evidence he offered
• holding that an expert’s failure to consider “‘all available flight test parameters in his model’” went to the accuracy of his analysis and not “the general scientific validity of his methods”
• holding that the expert’s methodology was reliable, even though he did not utilize all available flight test parameters in his model; the remedy is effective cross examination to test the expert’s analysis.
• holding that the expert’s methodology was reliable, even though he did not utilize all available flight test parameters in his model; the remedy is effective cross examination to test the expert’s analysis.
• stating that Daubert does not permit district courts to \evaluate the credibility of opposing experts and the persuasiveness of competing scientific studies\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).