Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 7/15/2003

Andrade v. Chojnacki

Citations

  • 338 F.3d 448
  • 2003 WL 21640925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Requests for recusal raised for the first time on appeal are generally rejected as untimely.”
  • “One of the relevant maxims is that the standard for bias is not ‘subjective,’ as it once was, but, rather, ‘objective.’”
  • “One of the relevant maxims is that the standard for bias is not ‘subjective,’ as it once was, but, rather, ‘objective.’”
  • “‘[E]xpressions of impatience, dissatisfaction, annoyance and even anger’ do not establish bias or partiality.” (quoting Liteky, 510 U.S. at 555-56)
  • “Subsection (b)(1) pertains to specific instances of conflicts of interest . . . .”
  • “This court reviews denials of motions to recuse for abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Wiener, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Andrade v. Chojnacki

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.