Court of Appeals of Virginia· 5/1/1990

Mundy v. Commonwealth

Citations

390 S.E.2d 525
11 Va. App. 461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding after-discovered impeachment evidence did not justify a new trial where the evidence at trial was otherwise sufficient to sustain the defendant’s convictions
adopting en banc “the reasons stated in the panel’s majority opinion”
adopting en banc \the reasons stated in the panel's majority opinion\
adopting en banc “the reasons stated in the panel’s majority opinion”
“We, therefore, must decide whether the waivers of the Miranda rights obtained before the two statements were knowingly and intelligently given”
“We, therefore, must decide whether the waivers of the Miranda rights obtained before the two statements were knowingly and intelligently given.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Coleman, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Mundy v. Commonwealth

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.