Stockton v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Stockton forfeited his right to self-representation because “between April 1989 and May 1990, Stockton shifted back and forth in his position with respect to self-representation”
• refusing to consider “issues raised in assignments of error [appellant] has not briefed,” and rejecting appellant’s attempt to “place the blame on this Court for refusing to grant him leave to file a brief in excess of the 50-page limitation”
• “[A] prospective juror [is not] per se disqualified because a family member has been a victim of violent crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).