Skip to main content

Johnson v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 581 S.E.2d 880
  • 41 Va. App. 37
  • 2003 Va. App. LEXIS 399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the third prong of the new-trial test requires proof that the after-discovered evidence “is not merely cumulative, corroborative[,] or collateral”
  • “Motions for new trials based upon after-discovered evidence . . . are awarded with great reluctance.” (quoting Odum v. Commonwealth, 225 Va. 123, 130 (1983))
  • “Motions for new trials based upon after-discovered evidence . . . are awarded with great reluctance.” (quoting Odum v. Commonwealth, 225 Va. 123, 130 (1983))
  • failure to disclose witness’ misdemeanor convictions prior to trial did not violate Brady because convictions did not involve offenses of moral turpitude and were therefore inadmissible at trial
  • “Motions for new trials based upon after-discovered evidence . . . are awarded with great reluctance.” (quoting unless plainly wrong.” Id. (quoting Wood v. Commonwealth, 57 Va. App. 286, 306 (2010)
  • “Motions for new trials based upon after-discovered evidence . . . are not looked upon with favor, are considered with special care and caution, and are awarded with great reluctance.” (quoting Odum v. Commonwealth, 225 Va. 123, 130 (1983))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.